Climate Change Hoax
|

INFOGRAPHIC: Climate Scientists’ Credibility Hurt

This is a great article on EpochTimes.com on the climate hoax. Be sure to subscribe to EpochTimes for great articles.

The Climate Change Hoax Argument Book by C. Paul Smith
The Climate Change Hoax Argument by C. Paul Smith

Many people believe that a consensus of scientists agree that humans are causing climate change that will cause catastrophic damage to the planet if we do not immediately enact numerous laws and practices to stop it. But those who believe insist that settled science has proved it, and they refuse to debate it, and they cannot explain scientific reasons to support it.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Kansas pulls COVID vaccine ads from TV

    The Kansas health agency stopped airing television advertisements promoting the COVID-19 vaccine after some Republican lawmakers took issue with calling the shots safe and effective.

    The revelation came during Janet Stanek’s confirmation hearing Wednesday before the Senate Public Health and Welfare Committee. Stanek is the acting secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment.

  • Transcript: Hunter Biden Press Conference January 13, 2023

    In a candid press conference, Hunter Biden addressed the House Oversight Committee’s investigations into his family. He acknowledged past mistakes and wasted privileges, emphasizing his accountability and ongoing amends. Hunter refuted claims of his father’s financial involvement in his businesses, citing lack of evidence and political manipulation. He highlighted his personal and professional achievements, including degrees from Georgetown University and Yale Law School, and his service on various boards. Hunter condemned the Republicans’ attack on his character, privacy, and family, particularly their focus on his addiction struggles and financial irresponsibility. He emphasized the absence of fairness in the committee’s actions, accusing them of distorting facts and spreading falsehoods.

  • |

    Oleg Deripaska – Working With The FBI?

    Sometimes it is the quiet, elusive ones who come back to haunt you. And for ex-special prosecutor Robert Mueller, one of those might be a Russian billionaire named Oleg Deripaska.

    The oligarch who once controlled Russia’s largest aluminum empire has been an international man of intrigue in the now-completed and disproven Trump collusion investigation.

    Deripaska was a disaffected former business client of Donald Trump’s fallen campaign chairman Paul Manafort. He also was a legal research client of Trump-hating, Clinton-aiding British spy Christopher Steele. In his spare time, he was an occasional friendly cooperator with the FBI and its fired deputy director, Andrew McCabe.

  • |

    U.S. Supreme Court is set to review the obstruction of justice charges

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to review Jan. 6 obstruction charges is a pivotal legal event, impacting not just individuals like former President Trump, but the essence of American jurisprudence. This case transcends typical legal disputes, probing the balance between justice, rule of law, and political accountability. It questions the application of a law, born post-Enron scandal, to the Capitol riot’s context. Conservative and liberal perspectives clash over interpreting laws’ original intent versus evolving societal needs. This decision will set a crucial precedent, influencing future legal interpretations and America’s commitment to democratic principles and judicial integrity.

  • |

    Full Transcript: Donald Trump’s January 6 Speech

    President Trump’s January 6th speech, a significant event in U.S. political history, emphasized his concerns about the election’s integrity. Asserting widespread electoral fraud, Trump encouraged his supporters to peacefully make their voices heard. He highlighted alleged irregularities and statistics from various states, underlining his belief in an electoral victory. Trump’s call for election security reform was a key point, stressing the need for voter ID and accurate voter rolls. This speech, pivotal in understanding the tumultuous events of the day, reflects the deep divisions and contentious political climate in America.

  • |

    Why Progressives Are Upset About Anna Paulina Luna’s MAGA Swimsuit: A Conservative Perspective

    Anna Paulina Luna’s viral MAGA swimsuit video sparked mixed reactions, especially among progressives. For conservatives, the “Make America Great Again” slogan represents national pride, but for many on the left, it’s a symbol tied to policies they oppose, particularly from the Trump era. Progressives often view MAGA as a divisive symbol, representing exclusionary policies on immigration, race relations, and LGBTQ+ rights. The viral swimsuit video has reignited feelings of frustration for liberals who see it as an endorsement of those policies. From a conservative perspective, Luna’s choice reflects her commitment to her values and free expression. However, understanding why progressives are upset helps explain the cultural divide and opens the door to meaningful dialogue. Luna’s swimsuit is more than just a viral moment—it’s a reflection of how political symbols are interpreted differently across the political spectrum.